Portfolio

Home
Alt Think ~ Home
Chapter 11 – Conclusions

Conclusions.

The Sea Of Energy

In Which The Earth Floats

by
T. Henry Moray

Chapter 11 – Conclusions

We have attempted to give a complete history of the Radiant Energy device as developed by Dr. Moray and described in his book, The Sea of Energy, first printed in 1931. We have corrected typographical errors, removed repetitious material, and made minor editorial changes in the text of the original edition. Henry Moray, of necessity, generated his own terminology for his original concepts, a terminology that is not always the same as that in general use today. Most of his theory, developed in the 1920s and ’30s were innovative at the time. For example, one engineer pointed out to me recently that when Henry Moray spoke of “cosmic rays” and of “energy from the cosmos,” he was not necessarily using the terms synonymously.

Some of Moray’s contemporaries claimed accomplishments similar to those we have discussed here. Readers may be familiar with the claims that Alfred Hubbard of Seattle demonstrated a device in 1919 that transmitted power without wires. Lester Jennings Hendershot claimed to have a revolutionary free-energy motor in 1925-28. In 1927 a Denver newspaper reported that Fred Walden and E.G. Lewis had demonstrated 200 watts of energy drawn “from the air.” In Michigan three years later; Chancey J. Britain was said to have produced an undisclosed wattage from his device; enough to over his own home.

As far back as 1901 Nicola Tesla is said to have patented free energy devices, U. S. patent numbers 685957 and 685958, described in the book Nicola Tesla: Lectures, Patents, Articles, published by the Nicola Tesla Museum, Belgrade, Yogoslavia, in 1956. As a member of the Tesla Society, my father obtained two copies of the book, but he had no access to or knowledge of the patents before the book was published. They could in no way have influenced his own research on RE.

Research into sources of free energy are continuing today. I list here the names of those I know have worked in the free energy field. Others I would appreciate hearing about, or if the experimenters are living, I would like to hear from them.

· Edwin B. Gray of Los Angeles has received publicity lately. I have not been able to contact Mr. Gray
directly, so I only know what has been written in various magazines.

· F.R. Reeton from Yorkshire, England (151 Cold Bath Road, Harrogate), believes that he can build a
“resonant cord inductor” electrical machine.

· Bob Jones and his entropy engine is mentioned in a booklet printed by James E. Cox, 1972, P.O. Box 793, Pamona, CA.

· Bruce E. Depalna of Keller Church Road, Bedminister, PA., and his partner, Ken Sniderman, have
developed a device they claim gives more energy than it uses. I met Depalna recently in Philadelphia.

· Bob Teal, box 802, Madison, Fla., reports that he has a motor that operates at very high frequency.
The secret is that he has connected this device through an oscillatory circuit and completed the circuit from air to ground. I asked him why he did not use a solid state device and bypass the moving parts. He said he was able to do this; however, he was unable to get more than a few watts of power.

· Wilhelm Reich, now deceased, developed a motor that I understand he claimed to use “orgone”
energy. This same orgone energy was supposedly used as a therapeutic treatment, which I believe is still in use today.

· Leonard Bergstrand, Rt. 2, Vinton, Iowa, has developed a motor using magnetic crystals of some kind. This device was rumored to have been purchased by Allis-Chalmers Corporations with the stipulation that Bergstrand discontinue research in the field.

In all cases it would seem that anyone who develops such a device also develops considerable opposition. The device is eventually either purchased by some large corporation for unexplained reasons and never brought to market, or the device is lost, or, as in the case of Edwin Gray, the inventor becomes tied up over secondary squabbles with security exchange commissions or other bureaucracies that have nothing to do with the actual operation of the device itself, but only with the business arrangements that have been made to produce it.

As far as I know, fraud charges are seldom leveled, and although I cannot vouch for any of the devices I mention above, I can’t believe that they all can be completely worthless, having seen my father, Henry Moray, work on his own device.

The question with any of the devices is this: How much power can it produce under controlled experimental conditions? The following guidelines delineate what one must do to duplicate Dr. Moray’s Radiant Energy Device:

When the primary side of the device is disconnected, a spark equivalent to 225,000 volts must be drawn between the two disconnected terminals.

2.
By disconnecting the antenna and re-connecting immediately, the lights must stay on. However, if the lights are allowed to die, re-connecting the antenna will not re-establish the connection and the unit becomes completely electrically dead.

3.
The energy produced must be high frequency.

4.
The device must be operable at a distance of more than 50 miles from power lines or radio stations.

5.
The light of a 100 watt lamp must be whiter and brighter than the ordinary 100 watt lamp without burning out after 157 hours of operation.

6.
When a heavy load is connected to the device while in operation, after already draining as much as 4 kilowatts, the present load must not decrease nor the lights flicker.

7.
A duplicate shunt test, like that made by Lovesy, with number 50 wire must be successful.

8.
Small number 30 wire should be used for all circuits.

9.
At least, 10,000 watts, and up to 50,000 watts of power, must be produced in a box weighing not more than 60 pounds.

10.
As the ground wire is driven deeper, the amount of power must increase.

11.
None of the components of the device must heat.

12.
No moving parts may be included.

13.
The device must be absolutely silent.

14.
By tuning the circuit by the use of variable capacitors, the lights must come on.

15.
A resistive load of 600 watts must be brought to full heat in less than 2 1/2 minutes.

16.
After 158 hours of operation, the unit must still be running and no parts of the device be heated.

17.
The test performed by Dr. Knudson must be duplicated.

18.
Smell of ozone should be present during the operation.

19.
No heated cathodes or bias power supply must appear.

20.
All of the above must be present at the same time.

The fact remains that Henry Moray demonstrated under the above conditions on numerous occasions, up to 50,000 watts of power. The device always sat on a table where it was easily examined by anyone coming into the room, so that it could be seen that the only wires entering the device were the antenna and the ground.

Today, attempts are made to give the impression that this is not correct. Descriptions given by witnesses along with photographs, more than adequately establish that this was the case. My brother and I are of the opinion that for whatever reasons, whether personal or business, at one time or another many of to individuals who became associated with Radiant Energy have attempted to discredit Henry Moray without regard to what the results may have been. We are convinced that Dr. Moray’s fears that he had been betrayed by those whom he took into his confidence, may not be groundless.

The Cosray Research Institute has but one purpose in mind and that is to insure that Dr. Moray’s work is continued. In an attempt to raise funds, we have formed the House of Moray Research Foundation, which we hope will be the means to develop Radiant Energy and other discoveries that promise to be of great importance in the progress of mankind. We hope that the reader will aid in the work by encouraging others to read this book.

We wish to invite those who have either discovered an energy source similar to Radiant Energy or any other energy source that is unexplained to unite with us. Only by working together are we going to be able to overcome the opposition to this field of research.

History has adequately demonstrated and established that for one to build for man’s benefit a working model of a concept revolutionary to science will not necessarily induce the world to clamor for it (regardless of how great or maybe even because of how great its potential is). Quite to the contrary, it only opens the door to extremes of skepticism, ridicule or even persecution from his peers.

Not until such a new item has been standardized and provided in numbers to many (quite often during severe opposition and at overwhelming expense), do the brave men adopt and enlarge its utility thereby lessen the risk of its being totally suppressed.

We believe the only way mankind will be given the opportunity to benefit from Radiant Energy is by the widespread dissemination of the notes combined with a collective effort by many interested parties to standardize it. In this way safety in numbers is achieved. For this reason we propose the following plan and encourage financial and supporting assistance to bring Radiant Energy to practicality for the benefit of mankind.

Cosray
Research Institute has recently compiled all of Dr. Moray’s notes. If funding were available, we believe these notes would allow the reproduction of his work. The question is, what can be done to insure the most expeditious means of developing and disseminating this discovery for the benefit of all mankind? We propose to go about it in two ways.

First, the House of Moray Research Foundation has agreed to offer $1,000 for the best theoretical paper explaining Dr. Moray’s work. Many people seem to think that they have to explain theoretically what is happening before they can accept the evidence that it does happen and is reproducible. The fact that none of the researchers in the field have had exact details of how Dr. Moray did his work, and consequently have not reproduced it themselves, is of no importance to us. However, it does seem to be of some great importance to the rest of the world to see how it could have worked, and therefore, in order to develop this field of research, we have concluded that it may be an advantage to approach this
research first from the theoretical standpoint.

Contestants for the best theoretical paper explaining Dr. Moray’s work must obtain an application from COSRAY, 2505 South 4th East, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84115. The theoretical approach must deal with the phenomena as described by Dr. Moray, although other phenomena not directly connected may be considered.

Second, and from the more practical standpoint, the Cosray Research Institute hopes to interest persons to join with it in the capacity of consultants, with full use of all information now available on Radiant Energy. Cosray is hereby offering a cash prize of at least $10,000 and up to $100,000 (depending on the number of participants) to the consultant who submits to Cosray Research Institute a
report and working model which in the opinion of Cosray makes the greatest contribution in advancing the standardization of Dr. Moray’s Radiant Energy Device. The decision as to which presentation and model submitted, if any at all, qualifies for the prize, rests solely with Cosray Research Institute.

In order to maintain proprietary rights, Cosray Research Institute will enter into a consultation contract and will lease to the consultant for eighteen months, copies of Dr. Moray’s notes, with comments as to the result of research made by Cosray in attempting to reproduce the device. We will include additional notes made by Cosray in its own recent investigations in which Cosray spent nearly $450,000 to collect and correlate Dr. Moray’s notes.

To participate in the consultation project, write to COSRAY at the above address. We will send an application with a self-addressed, stamped envelope; return this application to us within 30 days. Cosray Research Institute will review the applications and, at its discretion, send an unexecuted consulting agreement with the $1.00 consultation fee, lease agreement and escrow agreement to the applicant, who will then execute these documents and return them with the lease payment of $1,000 to Cosray- Randy B. Hart, Trust Account, at the above address. The lease payments will be held in an escrow account unto at least $100,000 has been received, at which time the funds will be released to Cosray Research Institute and each consultant will receive a registered copy of all Dr. Moray’s notes. The consultants will then have full use of the notes except as limited in the consulting and lease agreements. Cosray will lease at additional cost any components which it deems proprietory in nature.

Cosray Research Institute will have first option to utilize any information, presentation, or model submitted by any consultant within one (1) year from the date of submission. If Cosray fails to exercise its option within the prescribed period, title and all rights to the information, presentation, or model will remain with the consultant. Any consultant submitting any information, presentation, or model subsequently used to further develop RE, will receive a royalty, to be negotiated with Cosray Research Institute. Cosray may reject any presentation, information, or device submitted, thereby releasing it from any obligation to pay any royalty to the consultant.

Should Cosray Research Institute fail to establish at least $100,000 in lease payments from proposed consultants, all monies will be refunded less 7% for management, escrow and administrative costs.

This offer is void where prohibited by law.